I hear a lot of negative comments about Cued Speech or Cued English mainly from signing deaf people. I especially hear about how awful Cued Speech is from the big capital 'D' Deaf people. I read somewhere on DeafRead about how they found an article about some school using Cued Speech, in addition to ASL, 'disgusting'. First, thank you for pointing out the article. But, please, explain to me. How is it disgusting?
I understand why many people are against Cued Speech. It seems to threaten sign language. Perhaps a lot of them fear that people would prefer to use cueing over signing. Perhaps they see it as something that could interfere with sign language and communication; causing problems with the ability to communicate in sign language.
A lot of people think it is a language. It is not. It is far from a language. Cued Speech can never take the place of ASL and other signed languages.
Or perhaps some deaf people were taught Cued Speech and they absolutely detest it. Fine. If you don't like it, don't use it.
But, to those who have never tried Cued Speech, don't knock it until you've tried it. Take a class and learn how to cue, then come back here and gripe about it some more. It would be more credible. At least I can say, "Oh, well this person has tried it and used it, she knows what she is talking about."
Keep in mind, Cued Speech, in my opinion, is more appropriate for younger people who want to learn how to read and understand English, and for those who have super dedicated parents who are willing to learn and use Cued Speech consistently starting at infancy. Consistently. Not every other day. Not when you feel like it is necessary. But everyday, 24/7. (*A commenter asked a good question, how can parents be expected to use cued speech 24/7 while using sign language? Sorry, the '24/7' was an exaggeration, I did not mean for it that they need to use it 24/7--but close to it--if and big IF the parents decide that Cued Speech and oral methods will be the primary way they wish to educate and communicate with their child. Otherwise, I don't know how parents would use both ASL and Cued Speech together in the very beginning stages of a child's life. One would have to be used more than the other, I suppose. Parents would have to make that decision.)
I took a course in Cued Speech. It was very interesting and I learned how useful Cued Speech can be. It can be useful for those who use primarily sign language.
When I get the time, I will write more about my experiences with Cued Speech, both positive and negative.
I am tired of hearing mainly negative comments about it from people who never tried it or have taken the time to learn more about it.
(e
I understand why many people are against Cued Speech. It seems to threaten sign language. Perhaps a lot of them fear that people would prefer to use cueing over signing. Perhaps they see it as something that could interfere with sign language and communication; causing problems with the ability to communicate in sign language.
A lot of people think it is a language. It is not. It is far from a language. Cued Speech can never take the place of ASL and other signed languages.
Or perhaps some deaf people were taught Cued Speech and they absolutely detest it. Fine. If you don't like it, don't use it.
But, to those who have never tried Cued Speech, don't knock it until you've tried it. Take a class and learn how to cue, then come back here and gripe about it some more. It would be more credible. At least I can say, "Oh, well this person has tried it and used it, she knows what she is talking about."
Keep in mind, Cued Speech, in my opinion, is more appropriate for younger people who want to learn how to read and understand English, and for those who have super dedicated parents who are willing to learn and use Cued Speech consistently starting at infancy. Consistently. Not every other day. Not when you feel like it is necessary. But everyday, 24/7. (*A commenter asked a good question, how can parents be expected to use cued speech 24/7 while using sign language? Sorry, the '24/7' was an exaggeration, I did not mean for it that they need to use it 24/7--but close to it--if and big IF the parents decide that Cued Speech and oral methods will be the primary way they wish to educate and communicate with their child. Otherwise, I don't know how parents would use both ASL and Cued Speech together in the very beginning stages of a child's life. One would have to be used more than the other, I suppose. Parents would have to make that decision.)
I took a course in Cued Speech. It was very interesting and I learned how useful Cued Speech can be. It can be useful for those who use primarily sign language.
When I get the time, I will write more about my experiences with Cued Speech, both positive and negative.
I am tired of hearing mainly negative comments about it from people who never tried it or have taken the time to learn more about it.
(e




