I have been reading various blogs about the House Bill 1367 which proposes to "remove the outreach center currently housed at the Indiana School for
the Deaf, terminate all staff working in that center, and recreate a new
outreach center separate from the school" (from NAD's Action Alert: Support Ind.School for the Deaf, Oppose HB 1367). Many people online oppose this bill, while few support it. People in favor of communicating with sign language seem to be against it, while those who use auditory/oral means seem to support the bill.
I personally don't really have any strong opinions on the matter. I have never been to the school and the outreach center. I have not heard from or met anyone who personally visited the outreach center and receive services from them. From looking at their website, they offer several different services and support in various areas (speech and language, audiology, IEPs, working with mainstreamed students, Deaf Role Model, education, literacy coach, assessment services, etc.). Seems like a great place for parents and caregivers to get information and help.
I guess it would be more cost effective to keep the center and just add to it, whatever services the outreach center may be lacking. It is nice that the center is located on campus. I can see why some people are upset by this bill. There are concerns that ISD would have no control over what happens in the center and that it will eventually focus mostly on auditory/oral approaches since HEAR INDIANA will apparently be a part of the new outreach center.
However, since ISD students are entitled to free appropriate education, the center could provide services and information on all communication modes such as cued speech and AVT. I did not see anywhere on their website that discusses or provides information about these two. So, I can also see why some support this bill, because they would like to see more auditory/oral information and services offered for free.
Before forming your own opinions on the matter, unless you know about the situation first hand (have visited the outreach center and school, met people who work there, met people who use their services, etc.) it is important to actually read the bill, look at both sides and try to understand where each side is coming from.
Below are some links to bloggers and organizations against the bill:
Here are some links (not many out there) to bloggers and organizations supporting the bill:
We'll have to see what happens. But, in the end, whether a new center is built or not, parents and caregivers are still ultimately responsible for their children and learning about what they can do to support their children. There are no excuses in this day and age with easy and instant internet access to information about deaf and hard of hearing children, education, and communication modes. It is a daunting task, to weed through the information provided, no doubt. But, people should know better than to rely on only one or two sources of information. The information is out there on the internet, from various centers, schools, specialists, educators, deaf and hard of hearing people, and organizations. Do your research. Knowledge is power.
(e
I personally don't really have any strong opinions on the matter. I have never been to the school and the outreach center. I have not heard from or met anyone who personally visited the outreach center and receive services from them. From looking at their website, they offer several different services and support in various areas (speech and language, audiology, IEPs, working with mainstreamed students, Deaf Role Model, education, literacy coach, assessment services, etc.). Seems like a great place for parents and caregivers to get information and help.
I guess it would be more cost effective to keep the center and just add to it, whatever services the outreach center may be lacking. It is nice that the center is located on campus. I can see why some people are upset by this bill. There are concerns that ISD would have no control over what happens in the center and that it will eventually focus mostly on auditory/oral approaches since HEAR INDIANA will apparently be a part of the new outreach center.
However, since ISD students are entitled to free appropriate education, the center could provide services and information on all communication modes such as cued speech and AVT. I did not see anywhere on their website that discusses or provides information about these two. So, I can also see why some support this bill, because they would like to see more auditory/oral information and services offered for free.
Before forming your own opinions on the matter, unless you know about the situation first hand (have visited the outreach center and school, met people who work there, met people who use their services, etc.) it is important to actually read the bill, look at both sides and try to understand where each side is coming from.
Below are some links to bloggers and organizations against the bill:
Here are some links (not many out there) to bloggers and organizations supporting the bill:
We'll have to see what happens. But, in the end, whether a new center is built or not, parents and caregivers are still ultimately responsible for their children and learning about what they can do to support their children. There are no excuses in this day and age with easy and instant internet access to information about deaf and hard of hearing children, education, and communication modes. It is a daunting task, to weed through the information provided, no doubt. But, people should know better than to rely on only one or two sources of information. The information is out there on the internet, from various centers, schools, specialists, educators, deaf and hard of hearing people, and organizations. Do your research. Knowledge is power.
(e